kurtdesign1 wrote:Kip wrote: ↑Thu Oct 25, 2018 8:27 pm
I can explain, but pretty much only anecdotally. Of course, the pack density can alter how a tobacco behaves (which impacts flavor). Also, the cut of the blend (whether it's an intact flake, shag-cut, ribbon, broken flake, or cube-cut...they all matter, as this impacts at the very least burn rate.
As for the pipe, I have no idea why, except some pipes simply represent a blend differently. I suspect it could be to past blends in the pipe, in some way (although I believe this is minimal, unless you're varying greatly from its past, or the past is focused around a peculiar blend). I also suspect bowl structure/geometry makes for a huge difference (for example, a tall, sharply tapered conical bowl will produce a very different flavor than a short, squatty, broadly-bored bowl with the same tobacco). I'm sure there are more factors at play as well, but these are a good starting place. Bowl geometry intrigues me, as I don't have any hard, fast rules. There are as many ideas an opinions are there are bowl shapes and sizes....
Of course, things we've discussed before also have an impact. Boring, for example....as we've talked about ad nauseum, improper drilling causes extra moisture and all sorts of smoking ailments.
* - as a side note, I'm speaking of established pipes. New pipes without a bowl coat, during their break in period, have a *very* distinct flavor that is imparted to the smoke. This dissipates once cake is established, so I'm not at all commenting on them....
This is absolutely fascinating. It makes me think of the assumptions and opinions I have about cigars and how much I'd love to test them scientifically. Gosh, man. How can we actually take these colloquialisms and turn them into show content? It would be such an amazing, nearly industrywide impact if we could do it. Are pipe makers as "traditional" as cigar makers? Would you be met with "Gringo ignorance" if you proposed such facts after study?
A couple more things:
We didn't even touch on briar curing methods. Many makers have their own ways of curing their briar before use, and are highly secretive. Things like boiling it in types of oil or other concoctions, or differing times/conditions of storage. It's all black magic kinda stuff. I'm not sure of the longterm benefit (once there's cake, is there much difference?). It's hard to say. Many also coat the bowl with some carbon based coating - also not likely to matter once the pipe is established; this is to aid in break-in and prevent any chance of burn-out.
As for your question, there are many pipe makers who are *really* into experimentation. Some would be totally up for anything. The problem is, those guys are mostly artisan makers that command high prices for their work. So, experiments ain't cheap. It's not like a cigar where you can roll a bunch of samples for essentially no cost. Good briar is expensive, and it takes a lot of time to hand craft a pipe in a small-production setting. So, it's not like we could expect a series of side-by-side pipe tests. It's funny, pipe guys are typically seen as anachronistic and stuck in their ways - but most are eternally experimenting with blends and pipes, manufacturing methods and supply sources. At its base, a pipe is a block of wood with 2 holes, one of which fitted with a straw. But in its finer points, the minutiae is unfathomable.
Heck, there are people who'd also argue with briar source being a primary factor in your experience. Grecian vs Algerian vs Italian briar, etc. Some swear different places in the Mediterranean basin make radically different wood.
Sent via Caribbean smoke signal